🍒 Goldrush Group Jobs and Vacancies - Careers24

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🤑

Filter:

Active

Free bonus

Sort:

Newest

Popular

Ninth Respondent. The various interlocutory applications and disputes between the parties set out in paragraph 1 of his order would be dealt with first, where after the remaining issues in the pending review applications would be dealt with. Seventeenth Respondent. To the extent that paragraph 7. Sixteenth Respondent. In the matter between:. Mr Willies Mchunu states that he familiarised himself with the litigation and took legal and other advice from various quarters and formed the view that the matter should be settled. That it be declared that the transfer of the administration of the KwaZulu-Natal Gaming and Betting Act 8, of to the Premier of KwaZulu-Natal is unconstitutional and invalid, due to the non-compliance with section of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, ;. Heard: 1 June Delivered: 22 June The parties are invited to make written submissions as to why a particular costs order should be granted, for consideration by this Court in determining an appropriate costs order. In the heading Afrisun, following the wording in the notice of motion in its application for leave to intervene, cited itself as the third applicant. The main review, after its adjournment on 28 April , has never been set down again. Eleventh Respondent. This much is apparent from paragraphs 1. Twenty Fifth Respondent. Fourth Respondent. There are some factual disputes on the papers. Declaring that the aforementioned decision is unlawful and invalid;.

Case No. Twenty Seventh Respondent. Fourteenth Respondent. Twentieth Respondent. Fifteenth Respondent. About 32red casino reviews relief claimed in its notice of motion was as follows:.

Alternatively, to the aforementioned paragraphs, and in the event that the above relief was refused, or it was found that the Main Review was validly withdrawn, an order declaring that:. Second Applicant. Ordering that any respondent that opposes this intervention application shall pay the costs thereof and, in the gold rush casino hillcrest that there is no opposition, that costs be costs in the cause.

Applicant for Intervention as Fifth Applicant. Lopes J directed that the litigation be managed in two parts. Koen J. Reviewing and setting aside the decision of the first respondent taken on 16 October to approve the application submitted by Vukani Gaming Corporation Pty Ltd for the registration of Electronic Bingo Terminals.

Seventh Respondent. Second Respondent. First Respondent. The Galaxy parties accept that if it had the effect of granting leave to intervene to Afrisun and joining it as a here to the main review, that it is the end of the enquiry.

That a rule nisi [be] hereby [issued] calling upon Respondents to show cause, if any, before the above Honourable Court on the That pending the final determination of this application the following interim orders are granted The main review was set down for 5 February This application was set down for 6 February In its notice of motion dated 3 February Afrisun also contemplated a review of the impugned decision.

Twenty Fourth Respondent. Reviewing sands casino chester setting aside the decision of the first respondent taken on 16 October to gold rush casino hillcrest the application submitted by International Gaming Technology — Africa Pty Limited for the registration of Electronic Bongo Terminals.

Twelfth Respondent. Sixth Respondent. It cited the Forum as the fourth applicant. First Applicant. The relevant relief claimed gold rush casino hillcrest Afrisun was as follows:. Relevant Background Chronology. In Re:. Its intervention application has been opposed and is yet to be determined.

Those applications were set down for 5 February The application is adjourned to an opposed hearing to be held on 28 April The records in the main application are to be filed by Applicants on 13 th February Supplementary affidavits in terms of rule 53 4 are to be filed by 20 th February All final answering affidavits are to be filed 6 th March All replying affidavits are to be filed by 13 th March Full heads of argument are to be filed by 3 rd April All issues of costs are reserved.

Thirteenth Respondent. It is to clarify its position in that regard that a declaration of rights is required. The notice recorded an agreement regarding costs in respect of some of the respondents to that application. The Issues. Twenty Eighth Respondent.

That the matter be heard as one of urgency and the forms and services provided by the Uniform Rules be and are hereby dispensed with. At that stage too, the Premier had not been substituted as the second applicant in place of the MEC in the main review. Twenty Sixth Respondent.

The Forum abides by the decision of this Gold rush casino hillcrest. I shall respond to that invitation below. Twenty First Respondent. Third Applicant. Eighth Respondent.

Twenty Second Respondent. Tenth Respondent. These written submissions are to be submitted to the Registrar within 20 court days of this judgment being delivered. Alternatively to prayer 5 above, that the above Honourable Court order that:. There was no offer of costs or any agreement with Afrisun, the Forum and Peermont, but the notice did record that:.

Twenty Ninth Respondent. Fifth Respondent. Afrisun must then enrol the issues in paragraphs 1.

Coram: Koen J. That the costs of this application shall be in the cause, save and unless there is opposition from any party or parties, in which event such party or parties be directed to pay the costs of this application, jointly and severally in the case of several parties opposing the application. Thirty Second Respondent. Any confusion in this regard was however clarified during argument. Third Respondent. Those arguments fall under the issues yet to be heard as contemplated in paragraph 1. Thirty First Respondent. Twenty Third Respondent. Thirtieth Respondent. This affidavit was filed pursuant to the provisions of rule 53 4 after the record relating to the impugned decision was produced. That Afrisun is granted leave to intervene as the Third Applicant in the Main review. Nineteenth Respondent. Granting the relief sought by the Premier and MEC in paragraphs 1, 2. Further, that:. Fourth Applicant. While accepting that there are some limited factual disputes, Afrisun contends that the relief sought falls to be decided principally on legal issues. The effect of this affidavit was that Afrisun consolidated its own review with the main review and claimed some expanded relief. Eighteenth Respondent. That costs be awarded against the respondents, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.